The Securities Compliance Podcast Season 4 Episode 9 – Private Fund Rules Finalized: Trick or Treat?

Podcast

Securities Compliance Podcast: Compliance in Context

On Season 4 Episode 9 of The Securities Compliance Podcast: Compliance in Context, host and Calfee Partner Patrick D. Hayes features a Lessons From The Front Lines episode on the recently passed SEC Private Fund Adviser Rules with an esteemed panel of experts featuring three former regulators who served at the very highest levels of the SEC – Kristin Snyder, Dan Kahl, and Pete Driscoll. It’s no secret the SEC has been laser-focused on the private funds industry over the last several years, and now that the groundbreaking final rules have finally passed, our experienced panel shares some key questions and items to consider regarding the overall impact and how to implement these changes into a firm’s compliance program.

Season 4, Episode 9 Topics:

Show

Interview with Kristin Snyder (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), Dan Kahl (Kirkland & Ellis), and Pete Driscoll (PwC)

• What’s the biggest surprise from the proposed to the final rules?

• What are the three conditions to achieve legacy status?

• Breakdown of the Quarterly Statements Rule

• Where did the SEC give on Prohibited Activities?

• Breakdown of the Restricted Activities Rule

• What did the SEC have to say about the standard of liability facing private fund advisers?

• Breakdown of the Preferential Treatment Rule

• What constitutes material economic terms?

• When it comes to adoption, how can firms operationalize these new rules into their compliance programs?

• What are some major challenges that firms face with regard to these rule proposals?

Quotes

10:36 – “There’s a lot unsaid in there and a lot of trepidation as to application in the future. The commission very clearly said it wasn’t going to address state law liability issues. But to me, there are significant questions where the overlay of federal fiduciary standard and state law and what the staff’s views may be with respect to limitations of liability and how they address that. There was colloquy at the open meeting that this is no different than what the Commission did in fiduciary interpretation. But I think the devil will be in the details on application and the years to come on the pullback on the exculpation and whether it was actually meaningful or not.” – Dan Kahl

12:45 – “There are provisions that allow for legacy provisions to stand, but you really have to be careful in kind of unpacking exactly what is and isn’t covered by those legacy provisions because it’s not a blanket status that’s applied across the board.” – Kristin Snyder

20:52 – “And that’s what I’m hearing from clients is probably the biggest concern on how are we going to implement such a broad rule or series of rules, all the requirements – I mean, there are five rules – frankly, and given the breadth of what’s included, the detail that needs to be captured needs to be automated on a quarterly basis. You mentioned quarterly statements and both you and Dan mentioned the operational lift. And that’s what I’m hearing from clients is probably the biggest concern on how are we going to implement such a broad rule or series of rules.” – Pete Driscoll

---

About the Securities Compliance Podcast: Compliance in Context

Introducing the Securities Compliance Podcast: Compliance in Context presented by Calfee, Halter & Griswold, and the National Society of Compliance Professionals and hosted by Patrick D. Hayes, Partner and Chair of Calfee's Investment Management practice.

Designed as a personal master class for the securities legal and compliance professional, this podcast embodies Patrick’s passion to help you put Compliance In Context™ by combining the technical expertise of industry thought leaders and innovators with the practical experience of doers and key decision makers.

Listeners will find the podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify, and Stitcher.

---

The opinions expressed by guest speakers and panelists during Securities Compliance Podcasts may not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of the attorneys and professionals of Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP or its subsidiaries or affiliates. Calfee’s educational content is intended to inform and educate readers about legal developments and is not intended as legal advice for any specific individual or specific situation. Please consult with your attorney regarding any legal questions you may have. With regard to all content including case studies or descriptions, past outcomes do not predict future results.