HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC., ET AL. Yesterday, the Supreme Court made two significant changes to patent law. First, the Supreme Court threw out the current test for enhanced damages holding it was unduly rigid. The Court held such rigidity limited a district court judge’s discretion to award enhanced damages. Second, the Court lowered the burden of proof necessary to find enhanced damages to a preponderance of the evidence. The previous standard was clear and convincing evidence. While the Court did not provide a new test, it indicated 180 years of enhanced damage awards established they are not to be meted out in typical cases, but instead as a sanction for egregious infringement behavior.
Read the full decision.
This alert is provided by Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP for education and information purposes only. This alert is not intended to provide legal advice on specific subjects. The resolution of legal issues depends upon the specific facts of a particular situation and the laws involved and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This alert may be considered advertising under applicable laws. Some links within this alert may lead to web sites. Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP does not necessarily sponsor, endorse or otherwise approve of the materials appearing in such sites. All trademarks and copyrighted material are the property of their respective owners and the use of such material in this alert, articles, or by Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP is for informational purposes only and does not indicate sponsorship or endorsement by the trademark or copyright holder of either Calfee or the content of this alert.