Main Content
:

The decision to sell your business comes with many matters to consider. One of the most important things to carefully consider is the implication of accepting “rollover equity” from the buyer in lieu of cash for a portion of the purchase price. This consideration has become all the more relevant given that much of current M&A activity is being driven by private equity firms that long ago embraced the use of rollover equity. Sellers who are offered the opportunity to receive rollover equity in an M&A transaction should not necessarily shy away from this option; however, to avoid being “rolled” in connection with a rollover investment, sellers should keep a few principles and concepts in mind.

:

In this "Courtside at the Ohio Supreme Court: Reflections on Significant Decisions" post, Calfee Litigation Partner Andy Owen discusses the Supreme Court of Ohio's recent announcement that anyone seeking damages from a mortgage holder for failing to timely record the mortgage release need not prove that they were actually harmed by the failure to record.

:

How are companies leveraging emerging technologies like AI to improve legal operations?

During a Calfee panel discussion moderated by Intellectual Property Partner Brad Pulfer, in-house corporate legal counsel shared how they’re using AI to boost productivity, improve decision-making, and free their teams to focus on higher-level, more interesting work.

:

What are in-house corporate legal counsel doing to adjust for the regulatory landscape in the AI space?

During a Calfee panel discussion moderated by Intellectual Property Partner Brad Pulfer, in-house corporate legal counsel shared why enterprise-wide education, effective processes and measurable metrics are essential components of effective legal compliance related to corporate AI usage.

:

How are corporate in-house legal counsel successfully approaching the need to collaborate with their business units to support innovation, and specifically AI usage?

Calfee Intellectual Property Partner Brad Pulfer spoke with in-house corporate legal counsel on why integrating legal compliance directly into company processes – and keeping a “human in the loop” – are essential to achieving responsible innovation while avoiding the potential for biased outputs and product safety concerns.

:

How are corporate legal departments balancing customer demand and risk considerations related to AI-enhanced technologies?

Calfee Intellectual Property Partner Brad Pulfer discussed with in-house corporate legal counsel on how corporations and their legal departments are balancing customer-driven AI usage and risk mitigation.

:

What are the corporate legal department considerations related to generative AI policies, including cross-functional collaboration with an organization’s legal department, CISO and CTO?

Calfee Intellectual Property Partner Brad Pulfer sat down with in-house counsel to explore the key considerations for corporate legal departments when developing critical policies and practices governing the implementation of generative AI.

:

What are the in-house legal department considerations in branding their company's AI?

Calfee Intellectual Property Partner Brad Pulfer sat down with in-house legal counsel to discuss ways to ensure accuracy in marketing and branding AI tools to safeguard critical aspects of human decision-making.

:

How are corporations, and specifically corporate legal departments, adapting to evolving technologies like AI? 

Calfee Intellectual Property Partner Brad Pulfer sat down with in-house legal counsel to discuss various legal perspectives on the corporate use of AI.

:

In this "Courtside at the Ohio Supreme Court: Reflections on Significant Decisions" post, Calfee Litigation Partner Andy Owen discusses the Supreme Court of Ohio's recent decision published October 1, 2025, in which the Court declined to answer the questions presented to it by the federal court on the issue of whether hackers of a proprietary database have liability under Ohio law.


Calfee Connections blogs, vlogs, and other educational content are intended to inform and educate readers about legal developments and are not intended as legal advice for any specific individual or specific situation. Please consult with your attorney regarding any legal questions you may have. With regard to all content including case studies or descriptions, past outcomes do not predict future results. The opinions expressed may not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of all attorneys and professionals of Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP. Updates related to all government assistance/incentive programs are provided with the most current information made available to Calfee at the time of publication. Clarifications and further guidance may be disseminated by government authorities on an ongoing basis. All information should be reaffirmed prior to the submission of any application and/or program participation.


Subscribe

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page