Calfee Intellectual Property Partner Bradley S. Pulfer moderated a discussion with in-house corporate legal counsel where they shared their plans to adjust for the regulatory landscape in the AI space. The conversation focused on why enterprise-wide education, effective processes and measurable metrics are essential components of effective legal compliance related to corporate AI usage.
Recording from Calfee’s November 2024 CLE seminar, "Securing the Future: AI, Data Privacy, and Cybersecurity for Businesses," hosted by the Intellectual Property Practice Group, Columbus, Ohio.
Video Transcript
Question on screen: What are you [in-house legal counsel] doing to adjust for the regulatory landscape in the AI space?
Georgia Yanchar:
I think educating the C-suite as to the importance of these issues and the lift that is required to comply and just getting buy-in on staying across it and educating the company on it. For me, everything is about metrics. How many things did you automate? How many contracts did you create? I found at one point a couple years ago, all they're caring about, all the metrics they're asking me to report on have to do with selling and revenue, right? But I need a metric around compliance and what we're doing.
So we creatively came up with this whole rubric basically to do like a compliance score for each of our products and figure out what's the threshold and to say, okay, if we take each product, and we ask these 50 questions and we give a score, we figure out which one scored the least, and we make a promise that we're going to move our needle by x number points this year and x number points this year.
But I think putting in some kind of process, metric for improvement, like just keeping at it. It sounds like you guys have done a lot of just building the frameworks so you can keep across all this. It takes an investment of time. It takes creativity because every company is different and has its own challenges.
But I think just being really creative and collaborative and putting in place processes and measurements to stay across all of this is the main thing in getting buy-in.
Bonnie Smith:
I think education, that's a great point. A lot of it is education. I think with generative AI, what we've seen is a lot of non-technology people now want to be technology people and use it. I think education on the risks is key. We like to say we're building the ship as we are sailing it.
To ensure you receive future legal alerts and seminar invitations on related topics, please select the “Subscribe” button at the bottom of this webpage. You can also select the LinkedIn icon next to the Subscribe button to connect with Calfee to ensure you don’t miss future legal blog/vlog posts.
Series:
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part One): How Are Companies Interacting With Emerging Technologies Like AI?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Two): What Are the In-House Legal Department Considerations in Branding Their Company's AI?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments (Part Three): What Are the Corporate Legal Department Considerations for Policies Related to Implementing Generative AI?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Four): How Are Corporate Legal Departments Balancing Customer Demand and Risk Considerations Related to AI-Enhanced Technologies?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Five): How Can In-House Legal Counsel Partner With Their Business Units to Support Innovation While Still Addressing Compliance, Ethics and Other Concerns?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Six): What Are Companies Doing to Adjust for the Regulatory Landscape in the AI Space?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Seven): How Can Companies Leverage These Emerging Technologies to Improve Legal Operations?
Calfee has one of the largest Intellectual Property and Information Technology practices within a general practice firm in the Midwest. Of the 40+ skilled attorneys, patent agents, and paralegals in Calfee's Intellectual Property practice, more than 30 are registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Calfee has nearly 25,000 active patents and trademarks on its dockets, more than 15,000 of which are international. The IP team has handled filings in 190+ countries and has broad experience and a deep bench in prosecution, litigation, opinions, IP business strategy, and counseling.
Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP is a full-service corporate law firm with 160 attorneys and professionals in five offices in Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinnati, Indianapolis, and Washington, D.C. Calfee serves clients in the Midwest, nationally and globally in the areas of Corporate and Finance, Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation, Energy and Utilities, Estate and Succession Planning and Administration, Government Relations and Legislation, Intellectual Property, Investment Management Law, Labor and Employment, Litigation, and Real Estate Law. Calfee has been recognized as a leading law firm by Chambers USA 2025 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, Construction, Corporate/M&A, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation, Energy & Natural Resources, Environment, Government Relations, Insurance, Intellectual Property, Investment Funds: Regulatory & Compliance, Labor & Employment, Litigation: General Commercial, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations, and Real Estate, and by Chambers HNW 2025 in Private Wealth Law. A founding member of Lex Mundi, Calfee offers international representation through a network of independent law firms with access to 22,000 attorneys located in more than 125 countries. Additional information is available at Calfee.com.
Calfee Connections blogs, vlogs, and other educational content are intended to inform and educate readers about legal developments and are not intended as legal advice for any specific individual or specific situation. Please consult with your attorney regarding any legal questions you may have. With regard to all content including case studies or descriptions, past outcomes do not predict future results. The opinions expressed may not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of all attorneys and professionals of Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP. Updates related to all government assistance/incentive programs are provided with the most current information made available to Calfee at the time of publication. Clarifications and further guidance may be disseminated by government authorities on an ongoing basis. All information should be reaffirmed prior to the submission of any application and/or program participation.
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Seven): How Can Companies Leverage These Emerging Technologies to Improve Legal Operations?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Six): What Are Companies Doing to Adjust for the Regulatory Landscape in the AI space?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Five): How Can In-House Legal Counsel Partner With Their Business Units to Support Innovation While Still Addressing Compliance, Ethics and Other Concerns?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Four): How Are Corporate Legal Departments Balancing Customer Demand and Risk Considerations Related to AI-Enhanced Technologies?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments (Part Three): What Are the Corporate Legal Department Considerations for Policies Related to Implementing Generative AI?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments (Part Two): What Are The In-House Legal Department Considerations in Branding Their Company's AI?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments (Part One): How Are Companies Interacting With Emerging Technologies Like AI?
- Ohio Supreme Court Refuses To Weigh In – For Now – On Liability Of Hackers Under Ohio Law
- Supreme Court of Ohio Decision Offers Comfort to Ohio Lenders in Commercial Business Transactions
- Rethinking IP in the Age of AI (Part Four): Using AI to Make Your Trademark
Archives
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020