To compensate for delays in the issuance of Canadian patents, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) has, as of December 2, 2025, implemented a Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) system. The likelihood that a patent application qualifies for any term adjustment depends on several factors, though certain strategies can be implemented by the applicant to increase that likelihood.
Eligibility Requirements
To be eligible, a Canadian patent must meet all of the following requirements:
- The application was filed on or after December 1, 2020;
- The patent issued on or after December 2, 2025; and
- The date of grant is both:
- Five years from the applicable start date (e., national phase entry date for PCT applications, the filing date for a Paris Convention application or Canadian filing, or the presentation date for a divisional application); and
- Three years from the examination request date.
Increasing Chances of Obtaining PTA
Several factors affect the odds of a patent obtaining PTA, most of which relate to the CIPO’s own standards for processing a patent application (and the acknowledgment of possible delays). The CIPO calculates PTA by the period of time the application spends with CIPO for examination. If the amount of time the CIPO spends processing an application exceeds its own standard, PTA may be available.
Knowing what circumstances affect the PTA calculation is crucial, as the CIPO PTA Rules operate under a "chess clock" philosophy: if the application spends significant time in the CIPO’s hands, the likelihood of PTA adjustment increases. Alternatively, if there are applicant-induced delays, that time is subtracted from any time the CIPO would consider to be an overage on its part, greatly reducing the likelihood that meaningful PTA will be granted.
In order to maximize the opportunity for PTA, an applicant should consider implementing one or more of the following strategies:
- Defer examination. Deferred examination requests can impact the CIPO’s "clock" and increase the likelihood of PTA. If an examination is requested more than two years from the application start date, the CIPO’s prosecution timeline for examining a patent application changes from five years to three years. This three-year timeline improves the odds that PTA will be accumulated due to processing delays by the CIPO. Thus, even waiting to request examination at two years plus one day from the start date can impact PTA.
- Pay maintenance fees on time. Timely payment of maintenance fees will keep the "clock" running. The CIPO does not consider any period of time between a missed maintenance fee and its later payment a delay attributed to the CIPO, even if the application is in their hands. Thus, missing payment of the maintenance fee pauses the clock for accruing PTA.
- Consider making early amendments. Under PTA Rules, the CIPO subtracts the period of time between the filing of the first RCE and the date the final issue fee is paid from the PTA calculation, thus effectively ending any PTA accrual due to the general length of time the patent will be reopened for prosecution. As such, to maximize PTA and decrease the likelihood of an RCE, making amendments to the application early in prosecution may prove beneficial.
Applying for PTA
The CIPO requires applicants who desire PTA calculations to submit a fee (currently about CAD $2,570) within three months of the date of grant. At that point, the CIPO will make a preliminary determination regarding whether PTA will be granted. After the preliminary determination is made, a patentee has two months to submit observations to which the CIPO will respond with a final determination. If the patentee disagrees with the CIPO’s final determination, a judicial review must be requested within 30 days of the final determination.
As long as the patent remains in force at the time of expiration of its 20-year term and if a certificate of PTA has issued, the PTA will begin on the expiry. Annual maintenance fees of CAD $1,000 are required to be paid during the PTA.
Conclusion
Due to the 36-month minimum time limit the CIPO has to carry out patent prosecution before incurring any overages of time that contribute to PTA calculations, and due to potential applicant-incurred delays that may reduce said calculation, it is unlikely many applications will benefit from the new PTA Rules. Moreover, even if a patent qualifies for PTA, the CIPO’s published performance targets and customary processing times suggest that any PTA is likely to be minimal and may not be worthy of the fees associated with the PTA application process. Furthermore, in some technology spaces, an applicant may devalue the second half of the patent’s life compared to the first half. However, your patent attorney can assist you in carrying out a preliminary calculation and discuss whether a PTA application may be beneficial in your particular situation.
The attorneys at Calfee, Halter and Griswold are happy to answer any questions your company might have related to the Canadian Intellectual Property Office's Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) system.
Calfee has one of the largest Intellectual Property practices within a general practice firm in the Midwest. Of the 40+ skilled attorneys, patent agents, and paralegals in Calfee's Intellectual Property practice, more than 30 are registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Calfee has nearly 25,000 active patents and trademarks on its dockets, more than 15,000 of which are international. The IP team has handled filings in 190+ countries and has broad experience and a deep bench in prosecution, litigation, opinions, IP business strategy, and counseling.
Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP is a full-service corporate law firm with 160 attorneys and professionals in offices in Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati, and Indianapolis. Calfee serves clients in the Midwest, nationally and globally in the areas of Corporate and Finance, Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation, Energy and Utilities, Estate and Succession Planning and Administration, Government Relations and Legislation, Intellectual Property, Labor and Employment, Litigation, and Real Estate Law. Calfee has been recognized as a leading law firm by Chambers USA 2026 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, Construction, Corporate/M&A, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation, Energy & Natural Resources, Environment, Government Relations, Insurance, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation: General Commercial, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations, Public Finance, and Real Estate, and by Chambers HNW 2026 in Private Wealth Law. A founding member of Lex Mundi, Calfee offers international representation through a network of independent law firms with access to 22,000 attorneys located in more than 125 countries. Additional information is available at Calfee.com.
Calfee Connections blogs, vlogs, and other educational content are intended to inform and educate readers about legal developments and are not intended as legal advice for any specific individual or specific situation. Please consult with your attorney regarding any legal questions you may have. With regard to all content including case studies or descriptions, past outcomes do not predict future results. The opinions expressed may not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of all attorneys and professionals of Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP. Updates related to all government assistance/incentive programs are provided with the most current information made available to Calfee at the time of publication. Clarifications and further guidance may be disseminated by government authorities on an ongoing basis. All information should be reaffirmed prior to the submission of any application and/or program participation.
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Understanding the Canadian Intellectual Property Office's Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) system
- Rolling Over Without Getting “Rolled” – Points to Consider in Connection with Rollover Equity
- Supreme Court of Ohio Concludes that Mortgage Borrowers Do Not Need to Suffer Actual Harm to Recover Monetary Damages if Lender Fails to Timely Record Mortgage Release
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Seven): How Can Companies Leverage These Emerging Technologies to Improve Legal Operations?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Six): What Are Companies Doing to Adjust for the Regulatory Landscape in the AI space?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Five): How Can In-House Legal Counsel Partner With Their Business Units to Support Innovation While Still Addressing Compliance, Ethics and Other Concerns?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Four): How Are Corporate Legal Departments Balancing Customer Demand and Risk Considerations Related to AI-Enhanced Technologies?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Three): What Are the Corporate Legal Department Considerations for Policies Related to Implementing Generative AI?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part Two): What Are The In-House Legal Department Considerations in Branding Their Company's AI?
- AI Considerations for Corporate Legal Departments Video Series (Part One): How Are Companies Interacting With Emerging Technologies Like AI?
Archives
- August 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020