
Artificial Intelligence (AI) – most notably generative AI like ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Google’s Veo 3 text-to-video model – is rapidly reshaping industries, revolutionizing everything from content creation to complex problem-solving. As AI-generated works become more prevalent, novel legal issues concerning ownership and protection of intellectual property (IP) rights have emerged.
In Part Four of this blog series, we explore how to responsibly use AI with trademarks. If you want to look further into other areas of overlap between AI and IP, review our previous posts related to patents (Part One), trade secrets (Part Two), and copyrights (Part Three).
Use Caution When Involving AI in Trademarks
Trademarks protect brand identifiers – such as words, phrases, logos, symbols, sounds, colors, etc. – that distinguish one company's goods or services from others. The goal of associating trademarks with specific goods and services is to help prevent consumer confusion and safeguard a brand's reputation by ensuring that competitors cannot potentially use similar marks in the same industry. Common law trademark rights automatically apply in the localities where the mark is actually in use, though a federal registration may be filed to secure a presumption of nationwide protection. In either case, there is no expiration date on how long a trademark can be used provided that the use is continuous and not interrupted.
Current laws surrounding trademarks do not restrict use of AI in generating brand identifiers. Since the function of trademarks is to prevent consumer confusion, not reward creative human effort, there are no restrictions on the use of AI to create a trademark for your business. Similarly, there is no requirement that you disclose that AI was used to generate a logo, tagline, name, etc. that is trademarked. That being said, caution should be used whenever you are relying on the output of an AI model to create material that you use to represent your brand. As was the case covered in our copyrights post, since AI models are trained on data that comprise existing copyrighted and/or trademarked material, it is possible that the model’s output can contain this protected material. Using an AI-generated trademark could therefore violate existing copyrights or trademarks of other people or companies if it comprises the infringing material. Use of AI-generated material as a trademark may further limit your ability to protect sufficiently artistic logos with copyrights due to restrictions on protecting AI-generated content. To limit the risk that an AI-generated trademark may violate the trademarks or copyrights of others, an IP attorney can perform a search of registered copyrights and trademarks to provide a clearance opinion before filing a trademark application.
Key Takeaways
While patents and copyrights generally require significant human involvement in the creative aspects where IP seeks to protect and incentivize, trade secrets and trademarks have no such requirements, and AI involvement here generally presents a lower threshold of risk. If you have any questions or concerns about how using AI can impact your intellectual property rights or risk infringing the rights of others, contact Calfee's IP attorneys. We look forward to helping you responsibly embrace these new and exciting technologies while avoiding the potential pitfalls this powerful new technology brings.
Series: Rethinking IP in the Age of AI
Part One: A New Frontier for Patent Law by Michael E. Glennon and Bradley S. Pulfer
Part Two: Trade Secrets – To Disclose or Not to Disclose by Michael E. Glennon and Bradley S. Pulfer
Part Three: Copyrights and AI-Assisted Creations by Michael E. Glennon and Bradley S. Pulfer
Calfee has one of the largest Intellectual Property and Information Technology practices within a general practice firm in the Midwest. Of the 40+ skilled attorneys, patent agents, and paralegals in Calfee's Intellectual Property practice, more than 30 are registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Calfee has nearly 25,000 active patents and trademarks on its dockets, more than 15,000 of which are international. The IP team has handled filings in 190+ countries and has broad experience and a deep bench in prosecution, litigation, opinions, IP business strategy, and counseling.
Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP is a full-service corporate law firm with 160 attorneys and professionals in five offices in Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinnati, Indianapolis, and Washington, D.C. Calfee serves clients in the Midwest, nationally and globally in the areas of Corporate and Finance, Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation, Energy and Utilities, Estate and Succession Planning and Administration, Government Relations and Legislation, Intellectual Property, Investment Management Law, Labor and Employment, Litigation, and Real Estate Law. Calfee has been recognized as a leading law firm by Chambers USA 2025 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, Construction, Corporate/M&A, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation, Energy & Natural Resources, Environment, Government Relations, Insurance, Intellectual Property, Investment Funds: Regulatory & Compliance, Labor & Employment, Litigation: General Commercial, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations, and Real Estate, and by Chambers HNW 2025 in Private Wealth Law. A founding member of Lex Mundi, Calfee offers international representation through a network of independent law firms with access to 22,000 attorneys located in more than 125 countries. Additional information is available at Calfee.com.
Calfee Connections blogs, vlogs, and other educational content are intended to inform and educate readers about legal developments and are not intended as legal advice for any specific individual or specific situation. Please consult with your attorney regarding any legal questions you may have. With regard to all content including case studies or descriptions, past outcomes do not predict future results. The opinions expressed may not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of all attorneys and professionals of Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP. Updates related to all government assistance/incentive programs are provided with the most current information made available to Calfee at the time of publication. Clarifications and further guidance may be disseminated by government authorities on an ongoing basis. All information should be reaffirmed prior to the submission of any application and/or program participation.
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Ohio Supreme Court Refuses To Weigh In – For Now – On Liability Of Hackers Under Ohio Law
- Supreme Court of Ohio Decision Offers Comfort to Ohio Lenders in Commercial Business Transactions
- Rethinking IP in the Age of AI (Part Four): Using AI to Make Your Trademark
- Rethinking IP in the Age of AI (Part Three): Copyrights and AI-Assisted Creations
- Rethinking IP in the Age of AI (Part Two): Trade Secrets – To Disclose or Not to Disclose
- Reap What You Sow? How Businesses Storing Consumer Data Could Be at Risk for a Cybersecurity Breach.
- Rethinking IP in the Age of AI (Part One): A New Frontier for Patent Law
- Can AI Innovate?
- Trick or Treat? A Scary Tale of a Tariff Avoidance Scam
- The Innovator's Dilemma
Archives
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- November 2024
- October 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020